Why Celebrate Advent?

According to the Christian story, an eternally existing force that spoke the universe into existence took the form of a human via a Jewish lady who’d never had sex with anyone, entered adulthood as a pauper itinerant rabbi, performed a bunch of miracles, claimed to be the Jewish Messiah, gathered a HUGE following of fellow paupers, died, rose from the dead, etc.

That’s a whopper of a story.

It’s funny how us Christians get so bent out of shape when people don’t embrace what’s above, or make sport of our wacko beliefs. We get especially grumpy during Christmas time because we feel like the non-Christian world should spend at least one month out of the year celebrating our religion, while we spend 0 time celebrating anyone else’s.

We also spend 0 time asking ourselves if we truly believe; the most important question to ask during the Advent season.

But today’s Christianity is struggling. Those of us who’ve “kept the faith” have, too many times, turned to anger and hatred, especially over the past 4 years. Now, the fastest growing religion in America is no longer Christianity, and that makes us really grumpy.

Our anger and defensiveness are a sign of our disbelief.

Advent, on the other hand, is a season of hope, the kind that poses a great challenge to our spiritual garbage. In this, it’s important to ask ourselves: Did the story of Jesus really happen? If it didn’t, move along, have a great Christmas, celebrate other things, defend ‘Merica, etc.

And let’s be real, there is no proof. It happened a long time ago. The only evidence we have are some ancient documents whose origins seem dubious. Other religions have their dubious documents too. What makes our so special?

I struggle to believe, especially as the world seems to be so unravelled. Embracing the Christian narrative requires a huge leap of faith.

But I don’t have anywhere else to go; there aren’t any alternative propositions that don’t require a similar leap of faith.

It’s difficult to believe that the universe created itself; there’s too much order, too much evidence of design and purpose. You might say that I need to revisit the evidence, but I’ll remind you that there isn’t any proof here either. I’m not ripping on secular views of the cosmos, and I understand and respect my believing friends, I just don’t see them taking a smaller leap of faith than I have.

We only have two choices here, right? I can believe that the universe happened as a random coincidence, or I can believe that it had an intelligent, purposeful beginning; a “god” if you will.

From there, big as that leap of faith is, all subsequent leaps get much smaller.

Jesus appeared on the scene and claimed to be that “god.” That’s why the religious leaders wanted him dead; they were jealous of his influence and angry at the many ways he threatened their livelihood. But they couldn’t kill him for that, so they got him on a technicality: equating himself with god.

Pilate asked him if he was the “king of the Jews.” He answered, “yes.” Blasphemy. During a sunday morning service, Jesus took the pulpit, read a messianic passage from the book of Isaiah and said, very basically, “this sacred text is talking about me.” Blasphemy. Those and others are a claim to messiaship, and a claim to messiahship is a claim to deity, at least in the eyes of the people who crucified Jesus.

But this great king was born in hay and feces, attended by the biggest losers an elite Jewish person could fathom, heralded by a band of criminals.

Then he grew up and roamed around the first-century Judean landscape pissing off the leaders of his religion, the very people who could exalt him to greatness. Imagine a guy who could do the stuff Jesus did, supported by all the power of Israel. What a mighty political figure he would be.

But the powerful people wanted him to follow them. Jesus wanted it the other way around, but the only people willing to follow him were the kind of people who attended his birth.

Losers.

At his death, to top it all off, Jesus removed all of humanity’s sin, another thing that us Christians struggle to believe. We say we believe, then we seem to want to remind the entire world that their sin is still intact. Blasphemy.

John the Baptist saw his cousin and said,Behold, the sacrifice from God that takes away the sin of the world.” Jesus’ disciple John (who called himself Jesus’ favorite disciple) said:

“He himself is the payment for our sins, and not for ours only, but also for the whole world’s” 1 John 2:2

That’s a mouthful for a first-century Jewish person who believed that the only way to pay for sin was ritual sacrifice.

I don’t bring all of this up to preach or force my beliefs on you. I’m simply asking if all of this is true. If it is, it’s worth celebrating because it implies so much about our world, and our future.

For example, if God exists, why become human and walk among us?

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God… In him was life; and the life was the light of all people. And the light shone forth in darkness; and the darkness couldn’t handle it…

He came unto his own, and his own received him not.

And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us… ~ John 1:1-1:15

On top of that, why take sin out of the way? Do we need that? Aren’t we doing just fine with all of the religions that want to keep it front and center?

And why a resurrection?

If all of this is true, there’s a lot of power that we’d be celebrating all year if we really believed. We’d spend much less time trying to force our belief and way of life on others. If God has this kind of power, I can rest in the idea that he doesn’t see my sin, that I can live a life of humility and generosity without the fear of losing everything.

I also don’t have to spend the entire year celebrating my own power, or trying to prove its existence to others, or getting depressed when I realize that I don’t have the power I want.

I’m free to embrace and express the power that I do have; to bring peace and hope into the lives of others.

 

Photo by Gareth Harper on Unsplash 

Advent, Part 1: God’s House

There are a few ideas in the New Testament that stand out from other religions. Regardless of whether or not these have any merit (they could be complete bunk), it’s worth noting their distinctiveness, especially during the Advent season.

One of these is the idea of “God’s house” – the place where He resides – and, more importantly, who can come into it.

In ancient Jewish thought, God lived in a relatively small room in the center of the holy temple, around which everything revolved. You can’t understand how the Jews of Jesus’ day thought about their world without at least a cursory understanding of this arrangement.

In the most basic terms, if you were non-Jewish, you could enter the temple, but you wouldn’t get very far. Jewish folk could go a bit farther, but not as far as the priests. Only the high priest could enter God’s room, but only once a year. Anyone else would die if they entered.

His fellow priests would tie a rope around his waist before he went in to fulfill his annual duties. If he died, they could drag him out. To them, it was real. God was in there, and nobody dared go near Him.

There is a very clear message in all of this; a problem exists between God and His people, and between His people and everyone else.

You’ll find similar elements in other ancient middle eastern religions; temples, priests, protocols, social heirarchies, and a distant, elusive deity.

Not much new here

What’s distinctive about the Jewish temple is the door to God’s room. Historians estimate it to be 4 inches thick, which would further the idea that God doesn’t want to be bothered.

But it wasn’t a huge, impenetrable obstruction of wood or iron.

It was wool.

If God wants to keep people at such distance, why use a curtain? Wouldn’t a huge, guilded, diamond-studded door send a better message?

Three of four Gospel authors wrote that Jesus’ death somehow took the curtain (they called it a “veil) out of the way, leaving God’s house without a door:

“And Jesus cried out with a loud voice, and breathed His last. Then the veil of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom.” ~ Mark 15:37-38

On the morning of Jesus’ birth, Herod’s temple stood quietly as a nod to the way that people think about God, i.e., he wants obedience, “cleanliness,” and keeps himself at a distance because people, in general, suck.

While Jewish thinkers for centuries wondered why such a reclusive deity would want a door made of fabric, the New Testament authors put the puzzle pieces together.

The door was always only temporary. One day, it would go away.

What’s distinctive about all of this, especially in ancient religious thought, is that the barrier between God and His priests, and everyone else by implication, is gone, not because people magically became better but because God Himself, via no condition or qualification, took it down. That was the plan all along.

For the next 2,000 years, Christian thinkers would pen reams of thought about how available God is – he is now personal, unconditional, and, most importantly, close.

You won’t find this in any other religious thought, and us humans have been doing religion for a long time.

Again, it could all be nonsense. I’m not claiming that this religion is the only one that’s worth consideration. I have some thoughts about all of that, but I’ll spare you to make a bigger point.

If you’re up for it, let’s assume for a minute that all of this is real: God established his own nation, for whatever reason, and set up a religion that in many ways resembled all the others of its day. When the time was right, He added one element, himself, honoring and preserving the old system but redefining it into something the world had never considered.

Whatever it was that laid so long ago in a cow stall, surrounded by the world’s greatest losers, ushered in something so alien and outside the box that nobody had ever thought of it before.

If that’s all true, what happened on the morning of Jesus’ birth was the beginning of a new system, a new “deal between humanity and God” as the New Testament puts it.

Gone now is the idea that God only loves clean people, or people who have their shit together. No longer do I have to look down on someone for their “sin,” or exhalt someone for their religious adherence.

God doesn’t do that.

I’d argue that He never did.

More importantly, gone is the idea that I’m in some kind of trouble with God, not because I haven’t done anything worthy of trouble, but because Jesus took the trouble that was coming my way.

When some inner voice tries to remind me 1,000 times a day that I’m little more than a screwup, or when it tries to comfort me with the idea that I’m holier than someone else, I don’t have to listen.

The ancient Jewish scriptures looked forward to Jesus’ arrival, this “messiah,” and called him עִמָּנוּאֵל –  “immanuel,” or, “God is with us,” as we’ve translated it.

I think that’s a poor translation because, in this word, the “with us” part happens before the “God” part, emphasizing the idea that this reclusive, conditional, high-expectation God is now, at any time, standing next to us.

עִמָּנוּאֵל doesn’t emphasize what or who this God-person is, it emphasizes where he is.

Having ripped down the curtain of separation that was never intended to be there in the first place, he is now the “with us” God.

This has many implications for any would-be Jesus follower, but one of the most important is this: if God now operates free of condition and distance from humans, it is patently un-Christian for us to consider the non-Christian world and deem it unworthy of our presence, circling our wagons, tribing up, and resurrecting the distance that Jesus crucified.

Photo Credit: Nathan Anderson at Unsplash

Did Donald Trump Divide America?

America’s division problems existed long before the Trump era.

We’ve been like that for awhile now; a conservative administration will push agendas, pass laws, and cast visions that will utterly inflame the liberal crowd. Vice versa when a liberal sits on the throne.

Division happens every time we have a president.

But did Trump go deeper than the average leader?

I get into way too many political “joustings” (as one of my friends likes to put it), arguing with people who will never change their minds, or listen to what I have to say with any real interest. I happily respond in kind.

In an attempt to sway one of my adversaries on a topic that’s utterly unforgettable at the moment, I read 20 Trump speeches prior to the 2020 election.

I noticed something that you won’t find in any presidential speech of the last 50 years, not with any regularity at least.

To illustrate, consider a few snippets from Trump’s Jan 6th address at the capitol:

You don’t concede when there’s theft involved

Our country has had enough. We will not take it anymore

We’re gathered together in the heart of our nation’s capital for one very, very basic and simple reason: To save our democracy.

They’ve used the pandemic as a way of defrauding the people in a proper election.

… our country will be destroyed and we’re not going to stand for that.

They’re weak Republicans [those that don’t support Trump], they’re pathetic Republicans and that’s what happens.

Democrats attempted the most brazen and outrageous election theft and there’s never been anything like this. So pure theft in American history. Everybody knows it.

…our election was so corrupt that in the history of this country we’ve never seen anything like it.

We will not be intimidated into accepting the hoaxes and the lies that we’ve been forced to believe.

They want to indoctrinate your children. It’s all part of the comprehensive assault on our democracy…

These people are crooked. They’re 100%, in my opinion, one of the most corrupt.

The radical left knows exactly what they’re doing. They’re ruthless and it’s time that somebody did something about it.

…this is a criminal enterprise

This the most corrupt election in the history, maybe of the world.

…this is a matter of national security

They’re totally breaking the law.

If Trump’s right about all of this, God bless him and those faithful Americans who’ll take a stand for righteousness. If he’s wrong, according to the Merriam Webster dictionary, this is hate speech:

hate speech

 

 

 

 

I’ve written previously about the veracity of Trump’s 2020 election claims.

Fraud. Theft. Indoctrination. Criminal. Weakness. Destruction. Crooked. Ruthless. Corrupt. Law Breakers. Unprecedented in all of human history – all perpetrated, ironically, by those who don’t support Donald Trump.

In his defense, hate speaking is a time-honored method for solidifying one’s base; Trump’s not the first one to deploy it. Simply convince your supporters that a certain group is destroying their country, leave out any evidence to the contrary, then, poof, you have an army that’s too emotional to listen to anyone but you.

You might say that I’m reaching to far in my “hate speech” allegations, but in no arena does this kind of language lead to anything but chaos. Imagine a CEO who convinces one half of his employees that the other half is trying to destroy the company, or a parent who convinces one of her kids that the other kid is trying to tear the family apart.

Chaos.

Divsion.

The people who agree with you will love you, call you “hero” and “great leader.” How many times has history shown us where this road ends?

Every divided kingdom, and every divided city or house will not stand.” ~ a not-so-evangelical-Jewish-carpenter

Is Trump an evil person? Does he want to destroy America? Is national division his endgame? I don’t think so. It’s not my place to postulate on the reasons why he so frequently and consistently employs speech that only results in more division.

And more hatred.

Either way, if he’s elected again, you can expect even more, one of the many reasons why I won’t be voting for him.

Since January 6th, Trump has delivered many speeches filled with this kind of language. He delivered many others throughout his term as president.

Trump’s use of hate speech has no precedent in my adult life. Go and read 20 Biden speeches, or Obama, Bush, et al. You’ll find critiques, frustrations with the other side, maybe an occasional hateful use of the english language. But you’ll find nothing that matches the frequency and regularity of Donald Trump.

Nobody will argue that our country is more divided than we’ve ever experienced. What you’ll find in the middle of this mess is a president who has spent a significant part of his speaking moments inciting his followers to hate anyone who is not a Trump supporter.

Did he divide America?

Hate speech has one goal; forceful actions that disregard freedom and ignore any further attempts at negotiation, listening, etc. Leaders who employ it are either right, or completely unfit for leadership.

Photo Credit: Daniel Foster at Unsplash