What Kyle Rittenhouse Taught Us About America

The New York Times recently posted video footage of the Kyle Rittenhouse shootings, along with commentary and eyewitness accounts. The video offers the Times’ perspective on the story and, to my knowledge, contains most of the footage available.

If you’re trying to get your head around the Rittenhouse case, please add this to your info diet. I’ll warn you, however; the footage records all three shootings. It’s awful to watch.

I post it here because the video lays out facts that are fundamental to our understanding of why a kid would go on a shooting spree. There’s some bias present in the way the Times presents their stuff, but the raw footage doesn’t lie.

As you can expect, America can’t find agreement on what to do with Kyle Rittenhouse. On one extreme, conservatives want to brand him a hero. You can guess what folk on the other extreme would like to do with him.

From my perspective, there are three things that Kyle, right or wrong, taught us about America.

1. White Militia Privilege

During the Kenosha riot, opportunists and others saw fit to riot, destroying property and costing the city millions of dollars in damages. When the fires started, a former police officer, trained in the use of firearms, took to the internet to rally anyone interested in lending law enforcement a hand.

Soon, a bunch of white guys showed up, armed with AR style rifles. The looting, burning, and property destruction soon ended, while tensions rose exponentially.

From what I can tell, most of these men believed that they were there to help. An eyewitness paramedic recounts many of them shouting at Rittenhouse after the first shooting: “What are you doing?”

There’s also evidence that some of these guys walked with the protesters and pledged to protect them.

Few of them realized how inflammatory their presence was. White guys showing up to this kind of protest is one thing. White guys with assualt rifles and bullet-proof vests, allowed to roam the city with no restrictions whatsoever is an entirely different animal.

At one point, the police began to herd the protesters away from the park where the protesting began, toward an area where most of the militia had posted themselves. According to one eyewitness, the police coordinated with these guys to try and get things under control: “You know what the cops told us today? They were like, ‘We’re gonna push ‘em down by you, ’cause you can deal with them and then we’re gonna leave.'”

The video shows police officers in armored vehicles thanking the armed white guys and offering them water.

“We really appreciate you guys,” one officer said via the bullhorn of his armored vehicle.

My friends on the right will say, “hell yeah,” if folk want to burn and pillage, you can expect Americans to show up and help the police and property owners. My friends on the left don’t like the presence of coordinated militias at racial protests.

Guns don’t frighten me. I grew up with them. Most of the time, people who own guns don’t frighten me. But I’ll take a hard pass on armed civilians walking about during a protest. Kyle Rittenhouse and many others weren’t trained in the very precise discipline of staying calm when things go bad.

Rittenhouse’s first victim was a hyper aggressive homeless guy with mental health issues, fresh out of treatement. Seconds before the shooting, you’ll see him pursuing Rittenhouse, who turns and fires 4 times.

Rittenhouse stands next to his victim for a moment, looking like he’s about to lay his weapon down and surrender, or try and help, then runs away, to where we don’t know, as people are yelling at him.

Now, according to one of the militia men, he’s a scared kid with a gun, running through the streets while angry people yell at him:

“If you’re running around looking wild with a gun on you, people are going to think that you’re doing something wild with a gun on you. So they [the people who tried to disarm Rittenhouse] all reacted the way they shoulda reacted.”

This is one of many reasons why we shouldn’t allow armed militias at any protest. Sure, some from the Kenosha militia were former police officers/military personell with the proper training, but how many more weren’t? There’s no way to know, and this small-time blogger has no interest in assuming that everyone’s simply going to keep their cool.

But this isn’t just about the proper use of firearms during racial protests. A white milita carte blanche roaming the streets raises a significant issue, one that the black community reminds us of everytime angry white people assemble.

There’s no way in hell or anywhere else that this would’ve happened if the AR-toting crowd was anything but white. An army of black men with assault rifles strapped over their shoulders wouldn’t have gotten anywhere near this protest.

My friends on the right are quick to dismiss any discussion of white privilege, but I’ll submit the Kenosha protest as a very clear example of a place that only white civillians with guns can go.

And if one of these white guys shoots a few unarmed people, there’s really nothing wrong. He was just trying to defend himself.

2. Blacks Just Need to Get Their Shit Together.

Jacob Blake was shot 7 times in the back. If he had simply done what the police told him to do, as my right-leaning friends will argue, this would’ve never happened. “If Blake would have never been a felon in the first place, he would’ve stayed out of trouble,” they say.

The same goes for George Floyd. If he had chosen not to be high on drugs with a criminal record he would’ve never had a police officer’s knee squashed on his neck for 9 minutes while bystanders and other police officer’s told him to stop.

According to my friends, Jacob Blake chose to break the law, and when you break the law, you get trouble. Jacob Blake reached into his car for a knife while police officers screamed at him to stop. They condemned him on the spot. He got what he deserved.

Kyle Rittenhouse, on the other hand, gets into an argument with a mentally unstable guy, shoots him 4 times, runs through the streets like a crazy person (according to one eyewitness from the white militia), shoots two more people who try to disarm him (as you’ll see in the video).

White milita guy commented on that, too:

“Anthony Huber [second victim] went down like a hero. He thought there was a threat there and he was reacting to it.”

I’ll argue that fear rendered Jacob Blake and Kyle Rittenhouse unable to submit to calm reason. Now, one is a criminal, one is a hero.

America is having a hard time figuring out which is which.

A few years ago, I watched the full video of Philando Castille’s death. He reached for his glove compartment while a police officer pointed a gun a few feet from his head, screaming for him to stop. That’s not a good tactical move by the way. If Castille’s intent was to shoot the officer, he didn’t have chance.

But it’s also not a rational move. What idiot would reach for a gun in a box when the other guy already has his gun drawn?

I know what it’s like to have a cop shove a gun in your face. I also know what it’s like to be 100% convinced that the guy with the gun is going to pull the trigger because he didn’t hesitate to pull it on your friend who’s now bleeding to death on the pavement. It’s not a moment of calm, rational thinking. All drama aside, it’s a moment of abject terror.

I can testify that your best decisions aren’t made in those moments, and that you have little control.

There is a mountain of reasons why police presence is frightening to our Black brothers and sisters; a compelling story that begs our attention. But if you’ve refused to hear it, you’ll never understand.

We do understand, however, a 17 year old white kid who’s so frightened that he makes an attempt at three lives. We also understand a violent protest when it’s a bunch of white people storming the capitol.

When Black people misbehave, we condemn. When white people misbehave, we understand. That’s one of the many painful lessons we learned from Jacob Blake, Kenosha, and Kyle Rittenhouse.

Blacks aren’t afraid of the police because a bunch of tree-hugging hippy liberals told them to be afraid of the police. Most live in predominately black neighborhoods. They’ve seen things that would incite anyone to believe that there’s a problem.

For us white follk who’ve had an altogether different experience with law enforcement, there’s a mountain of data that begs us to consider a different story, one that comes courtesy of well-heeled researchers and other academians of all colors.

But we refuse to look. We’re too scared. The people who don’t think like we do have obviously given their minds to some nation-damning liberal agenda and are completely unworthy of the few hours it would take to consider something different.

So, we douse our minds with one side of the story and vomit our half-truth perspectives onto the internet, displaying a blatant ignorance for all the world to see.

I’ve done it hundreds of times.

Wanna guess why we’re so averse to exposing ourselves to other side of the story, one that might challenge us and strengthen our grasp of reality? We’re frightened. We have a desperate need to be right, to be the good guys, and for us Christians, to be on God’s side.

Ask me how I know.

You can always count on scared people to act irrationally.

3. A Long Walk Back

The ever more prevalent “Blacks need to get their shit together” argument is a symptom of the increasing propensity of whites to get angry any time a Black person talks about race.

I have a conservative blogger friend who temporarily wrote about the division that Black Lives Matter is causing, implying that they’re little more than opportunists who use Kenosha-like protests to further their divisive agenda.

The data that supports racial bias in American law enforcement doesn’t exist. Neither does the division that comes when a large group of people decide that they’re only going to consider one side of the story.

For a long time now, this large chunk of America has ignored the Black community’s pleas for police reform, among many others.

Because we’ve closed our eyes and ears for so long, it doesn’t matter what happens. Any time a Black person is shot, or allegedly mishandled by a police officer, there’s going to be trouble. And every time, right-leaning America is going to categorically ignore the mountain of problems that got us there, blaming everything – everything – on the Black community’s need to stop misbehaving.

In any relationship, when one party refuses to listen while blaming everything on the other party, trust will erode to the point where the realtionship will simply rip itself apart. Healing from that takes a level of courage that most people can’t muster.

A pastor friend once taught me about what it takes to mend a bad marriage: when two people walk a long way down a bad road, they’ll have to walk back.

The same goes for a divided country. I’m not sure we have the guts for the walk back, so we’ll keep walking in the same direction.

Election Fraud is Real, Folks

Roughly 1/4 of Americans (50% of conservatives) continue to believe that the 2020 election was nothing but a big cheat; Donald Trump is our true President.

That’s a lot of people.

When the crowd gets that big, you have to wonder if it’s true.

I have a conservative friend who’s a firm believer in this, so I asked him for the best articles that support a stolen election. I had a hard time finding resources on the internet; Google seems to be throttling anything in support of his views.

He and I don’t agree on most political things, but he’s a smart guy, and I respect him. We were in Jr. High band together.

Between his Facebook feed and search results on “alternative” search engines, I ended up studying 10 articles that support a rigged election. There are so many more to consider, so I can’t say that I ended up with a solid understanding of how my pro-Trump friends are feeling right now. But I do have a better grasp and would like to share some thoughts/armchair analyses on why so many continue to believe that Trump is America’s true president.

Mail-In Ballots and the Last Minute Biden Surge

Early into the 2020 election count, as my family and I sat on on our basement couch, biting our nails, Biden was losing. We went to bed completely bummed; it looked like we’d have another 4 years of the worst president I’ve ever seen.

Then, suddenly, poof! Biden won, garnering an unprecedented number of votes.

How could that be?

Foul play?

There are two stories that attempt to explain what happened: one claims that Biden’s last-minute surge is clear evidence of election tampering on many levels, the other claims that liberal voters utilize mail-in ballots more than conservatives.

Story “a” relies heavily on the belief that Trump was a picked-on president, that liberals simply decided to hate him. It was this hate that drove a nationwide, concerted effort to ensure his loss. More specifically, liberals used the Coronavirus to excuse late acceptance of mail-in ballots. Ultimately, the left exploited COVID to further game the system.

There’s evidence to support this.

Story “b” relies heavily on the idea that mail-in ballots are a secure way to vote. Sure, there will always be folks trying to scam the system – on both sides – but according to expert opinion, mail-in voting is not significantly less secure than its in-person counterpart.

Story “b” proponents also point to the idea that election officials count mail-in ballots later than live votes. An election won by the mail-in crowd would conclude later in the process, even more so given pandemic concessions.

Is that true? Should I believe it?

There are two compelling stories here, both sides convinced that their’s is a slam-dunk reality.

Which should I believe?

Dominion Voting Machines

Among other things, pro-Trump conservatives (story “a”) discovered that Dominion’s head of security and product strategy, Eric Coomer, is an extreme left Antifa supporter who posted pro-police-violence content on social media. Dominion didn’t force him to remove his posts or make any apology.

All true.

This side of the story concludes; if Dominion doesn’t care about its upper leadership publicly supporting Antifa and beyond, doesn’t that make Dominion Voting Machines Antifa and beyond?

That’s interesting.

The right keeps complaining about “woke” organizations that fire/censor their employees for posting, for example, racist content. But an organization that doesn’t censor an exec for Antifa content must be pro-Antifa.

Liberals (story “b”) counter that one nutjob executive doesn’t define the entire organization, nor does it offer any strong evidence for a rigged election.

But let’s be real; If Biden had lost the election, and the head of security and product strategy of a leading voting machine company was a sold-out member of the Proud Boys, liberals would make the same accusations.

Story “a” also notes multiple Dominion-related irregularities in multiple counties. This is true as well. These contraptions didn’t function as well as they should have. You don’t have to go far to conclude that bad actors tampered with these machines.

Story “b” references recounts and audits galore, concluding that irregularities happen in every election. No machine functions properly, but investigators found no proof of tampering.

A or B?

There are so many more accusations, arguments and excuses to consider. And rest assured – people cheated!! That’s a proven fact that should disturb all of us.

I offer what’s above as an example of the vast expanse that exists between people who believe the “Biden won, fair and square” story, and those who believe in a rigged election.

Both stories have merit, and some evidence, but because they are so drastically different, only one can be right. As history shows us so often when perspectives are so polarized, there is no middle ground – the truth lies either left or right.

But before we ask which story is real, we should first ask if we’ve fully understood both of them. It’s impossible to have a functional grasp of what’s really happening unless we’ve heard AND understood both sides.

Right now, in this current American moment, that ain’t happening.

There is a fundamental belief that keeps that from happening.

Within the 25% mentioned above, many believe that liberals want nothing more than to destroy America. How can you believe a story spawn from evil itself? Only an evil person would listen. Conservative Christian America has been calling liberal America “evil” for a long time now. 30 years ago, I sat in the pews of a small church in Arkansas, listening to the pastor remind us all that conservatism is God’s politics. Liberals aren’t just the enemy of God, they’re the enemy of America.

Where did my conservative comrades get that idea?

Here’s my guess:

Consider a snippet from one of Donald Trump’s latest speeches:

… Joe Biden and the radical left have brought our nation to the brink of ruin. There’s never been anything like what has happened. After just nine months under Biden, violent criminals and blood-thirsty gangs are taking over our streets, illegal aliens and deadly drug cartels are taking over our borders. Inflation is taking over our economy. China is taking over our jobs. The Taliban has taken over Afghanistan. Lunatic leftists are taking over our schools and radical socialists are taking over our country. And we’re not going to let that happen. 

trump

 

Not “we’ve got some problems at the border,” or, “we’ve got some problems with inflation,” but, “takeover,” “bloodthirsty,” “deadly,” “lunatic,” et al: violent, inflammatory untruths that have only one intent: national division.

Most of Trump’s speeches are available via online transcript, and too many of them contain language like this. I’ve read them. It’s nauseating. Liberals are destroying our country, according to him, and we shouldn’t put up with it.

This is the genesis of election story “a.” Trump uttered words like “rigged!” “stolen!” etc. Because, up to this point, he had garnered so much trust, 70% of his constituency believed him, then went looking for evidence, and found it.

Go figure.

It’s not unlike Christians in the antebellum south who wanted to keep slavery alive and so went looking to justify it in the Bible. They needed their agenda to be a God thing and twisted scripture to make it so. It was only there because they wanted it to be there.

Likewise, Trump said it, it must be true, let’s go find it.

Take Donald Trump out of the equation and the 25% shrinks significantly.

You’ll never hear me comparing Trump to Hitler, but I have no problem comparing the way he talks about liberals to the way Hitler talked about the Jews. Trump is using the same words and ideas, those that his angry countrymen so desperately want to hear, inflaming them to unthinkable heights.

He has no genocidal agenda, He simply wants to win at any cost. But he’s convinced his followers to limit their diet solely to his side of the story and to villify everything else.

The 25% of America that believes story “a” isn’t stupid, they’ve just decided, at a trusted politician’s behest, that anyone who supports story “b” is evil. Only an evil person would give their side of the story a mere ounce of consideration.

No Truth in Half Truth

That’s all problematic of course because story “a” ignores many compelling facts and opinions about the 2020 election. Following are at the top of my list:

It’s true that there were many irregularities and instances of downright fraud in this election.

Election fraud is real.

But it exists in every election, especially if you go looking for it. The deeper you dig, the more you’ll find. From where I sit, I see an unprecedented number of accusations, investigations, lawsuits, etc. Should the resulting number of investigations and proven cases surprise us?

My house is in relatively good shape with a few issues that need attention. If I go over it with a fine-toothed comb, however, I’ll find hundreds of problems.

Did we find a bunch of problems because there were more than ever before, or did we find so many because we dug deeper than we usually do?

Were these irregularities so irregular?

The ones we did find offer no solid proof of foul play. Testimony from election officials in all 50 states (some listed here) agrees. So do folks like Bill Barr, Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh, Arkansas GOP Governor Asa Hutchinson, Prominent GOP Layer Ben Ginsburg, and many other Republican leaders, Legal folk, etc.

The National Academy of Sciences chimed in as well:

We have closely examined what we consider the most prominent statistical claims of fraud in the 2020 election. Although the claims are diverse, our conclusion is consistent: For each claim, we find that what is purported to be an anomalous fact about the election result is either not a fact or not anomalous.

In many cases the alleged fact, if shown to withstand scrutiny, would hardly constitute convincing evidence that Biden was elected due to fraud: A modest advantage to Biden in counties that chose to use Dominion machines, for example, could be explained by chance, by factors not accounted for in statistical models, or indeed by pro-Trump fraud undertaken using other voting machines.

As it happens, the allegedly anomalous features we consider appear mundane once properly measured or placed in the appropriate context.

On one hand, I’m disappointed that the US Supreme Court consistently brushed aside Trump’s case. It would’ve been helpful for the highest court in the land to offer their official take on this. On the other hand, the Court sent a clear message that it will not tolerate anyone who pulls a case out of their arsehole with little-to-no compelling evidence.

Many of the 25% now villify the courts for passing on all of this. But had the courts heard the case and ruled in favor of liberal sentiment, they’d still be villified.

There’s nothing to gain here.

I do think that the Pennsylvania case is an exception: can state-level courts decide to extend an election deadline, allowing more mail-in ballots than normal? If there’s actually a deadly pandemic, sure, there will need to be some concessions. But Coronavirus, to the story “a” crowd, wasn’t a big enough deal to merit a drastic shift in election procedure.

Either way, mail in voting didn’t significantly affect election results. Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, a Republican Bush-era appointee wrote in his dissent: “That decision to rewrite the rules seems to have affected too few ballots to change the outcome of any federal election.”

Ultimately, there is a legitimate, compelling side to the election fraud story, one that points to an election no more remarkable than any other.

I’ll argue that people who villify this side of the story aren’t looking for truth.

I’ll also guarantee you that, had Trump won the election, there would be plenty of one-story-only liberals calling a slam-dunk foul.

Trust Problems

Ironically, the 25% are the same folks who took to social media in the early days of Coronavirus, calling it a hoax, claiming that the CDC’s data was fake and/or overblown, posting videos of unqualified medical professionals trying to convince the world of foul play.

They villified the other side of the story: majority, worldwide opinion from experts in the fields of epidemiology, virology, public health, and others. Why take the testimony of majority, worldwide, expert opinion when you’ve found three epidemiologists and ten family practice doc who are going out of their way to convince the world that you’re right?

Today, few – including the 25% – are arguing whether or not Coronavirus is real, or that it’s killed hundreds of thousands of Americans, or that the CDC’s numbers are reliable, or that vaccines work. My friends were wrong, not because they were stupid, but because they ignored the other side of the story.

Is that what’s happening with those who believe in a stolen election?

Further adding to my suspicioun, this crowd also believes that Donald Trump is one of the best presidents America has ever seen.

In compiling its list of the 10 Worst Presidents, U.S. News averaged presidents’ scores from three separate metrics: C-SPAN’s 2021 Presidential Historians Survey, Siena College’s Presidential Expert Poll and the Presidential Greatness Rankings conducted by professors at the University of Houston and Boise State University. You can read the results here.

Leaving Trump aside, this list doesn’t lie. The presidents who occupy the top slots were really bad presidents.

Is Trump some kind of anomaly, the only good president in the bad president’s list? Isn’t this another example of people simply hating him?

Or was he really that bad?

According to these surveys, Trump is anywhere from the worst to the fourth-worst president in US history.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but there aren’t any similar surveys claiming that Trump was the best president ever, much less a functional one. It’s hard to hear my friends cry out their undying praise for a president who’ll go down in history as one of the worst.

If nothing else, this is further evidence that the 25% crowd likes to read the same story, over and over again, at bedtime:

Once upon a time, there were some liberals, and they were so powerful and so organized and so coordinated that they orchestrated an evil plot to overturn an election. An election!!! Everything they do and say is an attempt to destroy our country, as the great Donald Trump has told us over and over and over again. 

What bothers me more than anything else is that the 25% is utterly and permanently convinced that 2020 election fraud, powerful enough to steal Trump’s presidency, is a fact.

It’s a slam dunk.

It’s not. As I’ve stated above, there’s some evidence, but it’s not so strong that we need to run around accusing the other side of perpetrating such an impressive feat.

Anti-Hitler sentiment was and always will be a slam dunk. The same goes for abolition. But a stolen 2020 election?

Believe it if you want to, but stop calling it fact.

Good Business

If I was the main guy at Google, I would throttle these stories as well. That’s not censorship, it’s just good business. Arguments in favor of election fraud are increasingly low quality, and search engines that put low quality articles at the top of their list won’t be around much longer.

It’s like that for any business: an art museum that specializes in 3rd grade crayon drawings, a cafe that specializes in stale donuts and decaf coffee, etc. won’t make much money.

So, you can expect Google to put low quality stuff near the bottom of your search results – everything from no-name blog posts to conspiracy theories about the 2020 election.

But, because so many Americans continue to buy into this, you can expect some media outlets to serve up a smorgasbord. These are the obscure, formerly unheard of’s who would go out of business were it not for the many conspiracy theories that the Trump era has spawned.

The real fraud is a politician who knows the truth. Trump’s not an idiot. The people who surround him aren’t idiots. He’s got the numbers. But he also knows that he can manipulate the anger of his constituents to further his Trump-at-any-cost agenda. That’s why he uses angry, inflammatory, manipulative words in most of his rhetoric.

As a Christian, I can tell you that anger, every time, makes us suckers for people who’ll use it against us for their benefit. Hitler didn’t do his Hitler stuff because he was some kind of political genius. Germany was angry and Hitler found a way to exploit it.

Happens all the time.

Take away the anger and Hitler has no power.

If one of my kids is angry at the other, and I tell them, “you have every right to be angry, don’t put up with their crap, you have to stand up for yourself, they want to hurt you,” etc., guess what comes next: a search for deeper truth? An investigation into the other side of the story?

Nope.

Even if I add a brief “but don’t hurt them” somewhere in my speech, I can expect bad things to follow.

Because I’ve taken their side in an emotionally heated moment, because I used language that communicates care and concern, because I declared them “right” and the other side “wrong,” they’ll trust me more than they ever have, and embrace the opposite sentiment for their family member.

Angry people are always the easiest to defraud.

Photo credit: Colin Lloyd

On Downplaying the Capitol Riot

It’s a thing. There’s a narrative circulating via social media and conservative mouthpieces that the Capitol protest of Jan 6th was mostly peaceful.

As it goes, liberal mouthpieces and others are “feeding” America a misleading story of violence and insurrection. If we’ll do a little homework, however, we’ll quickly learn that, yes, these people shouldn’t have entered the building, but beyond that, the Jan 6th protest was no riot. It was simply a peaceful protest that got a bit out of hand.

The “riot” story is just another feeble attempt to discredit Trump.

I watched three videos shortly after the protest; one depicting ~ 100 people in a hallway, threatening a Capitol police officer who refused to give further access. He relented shortly after one of the protesters was shot in the chest.

The other two videos were of Donald Trump addressing the crowd.

Before the breach, Trump talked for about an hour and fifteen minutes. He spent 4 seconds referencing the need for a peaceful demonstration, followed by one hour, fourteen minutes, and 56 seconds declaring that his followers would lose their country if they didn’t fight, that the evil liberals had stolen their election and robbed them of a great president, etc., etc.

During the occupation, via a video that no protestor would’ve seen in the moment, Trump tried to convince them to stand down. His speech included words like “go home,” “we don’t want violence,” etc., but again, the majority of his content referenced fighting, being cheated, losing a country, and the like:

If I was a Trump supporter who made a long journey to the Capitol because I thought an election was stolen, I would’ve stormed it too.

But when trying to parse out whether or not this protest was an actual riot, I have one data point: the perspective of law enforcement officers inside the capitol building – boots on the ground. To my knowledge, none of these folks would agree that this was anything less than a full-on, deadly riot.

The acting Capitol Police Chief called it an act of terrorism, and the protesters, insurrectionists.

For your perusal, consider these quotes from law enforcement officers on Capitol grounds during the attack:

“I was grabbed, beaten, Tased, all while being called a traitor to my own country… I was at risk of being stripped of and killed with my own firearm, as I heard chants of, ‘Kill him with his own gun.” ~ Michael Fanone.

“One woman in a pink ‘MAGA’ shirt yelled, ‘You hear that, guys, this ni##er voted for Joe Biden!’ Then the crowd, perhaps around 20 people, joined in, screaming ‘Boo! F##king  ni##er'” “I was just trying to survive that day and get home…” ~ Harry Dunn.

“We were all fighting for our lives to give you guys a chance to go home to your families… and now the same people who we helped, the same people who we gave them the borrowed time to get to safety, now they are attacking us, they are attacking our characters.” ~ Aquiline Gonell – talking about people trying to downplay the attack.

“As soon as they hit the west gate, I knew it was like no other mob we’d ever seen. They hit that gate. They immediately tore it apart,” Sund said. “They started fighting with the officers and started hitting them with the fence that we were trying to secure the Capitol with. That’s when I knew things were going bad quick.” ~ Steven Sund, former Capitol police chief

We were battling, you know, tooth and nail for our lives… We held the line there in that doorway, and I guess I got pinned through the small back-and-forth we had fighting for, you know, every inch. And I had my arms pinned at that point, I wasn’t able to defend myself.” “At that point, I was also, you know, sucking in OC and CS gas, so I was pretty disabled at that point… I thought, you know, this might be it. I might die and there’s nothing I can do to defend myself at this point. So I just started screaming at the top of my lungs for them to give me a way out, get me a line of retreat. Thankfully someone was able to do that and I was able to extricate myself.” ~ Daniel Hodges

“I don’t think we even understood the magnitude and the amount of people that were actually there… By the time I got there, officers were already getting, you know, sprayed with whatever these individuals had, which I believe they had bear mace which is literally used for bears. They’re spraying it at us — human beings — which is, you know, putting us out of service for a while. I mean, I got hit with it plenty of times that day and it just seals your eyes shut… You just would see officers going down, trying to, you know, douse themselves with water, trying to open their eyes up so they can see again… And at the same point, these people are still trying to push and gain access to the Capitol.” ~ Christina Laury

Sounds violent to me. But was it an insurrection? Were the protesters trying to wrangle some level of control from the US government? I guess that depends on how you parse the meaning of “Stop the Steal!”

Downplaying this is dangerous. Sure, all administrations do bad things. All bad politics get spun in positive albeit misleading directions. But an invasion of the US Capitol, a violent one at that?

Unprecedented in my lifetime.

The downplay of America’s worst pandemic by a sitting president?

The division that exploded under the Trump administration?

That’s unprecedented, too.

From my perspective, this particular administration perpetrated unbelievable things. It certainly expanded the boundaries of what politicians can get away with.

Either way, chalking these up to “that’s just politics,” comparing them to the previous administration’s shenanigans, or downplaying them in any fashion poses a significant threat to the many things required to make a country great.

Photo by Colin Lloyd on Unsplash